Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Lisa Zaar vs Caijsa Wilda Hennemann Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Zaar vs Hennemann analysis and find out who is favored!
Lisa Zaar vs Caijsa Wilda Hennemann Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Zaar 1 - 0 Hennemann
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Zaar has won 45.9% of points on their second serve, while Hennemann has won 46.23%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Zaar, in recent form, has won 61.25% of their opponent's second serve points, while Hennemann has won 58.38%. The same stats for first serve returns are 47.01% and 49.47% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Zaar has saved 51.95% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hennemann has saved 52.9% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Zaar has won 54.55% of matches played (W/L 18/ 15), with Hennemann winning 66.67% (W/L 50/ 25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Zaar has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 27/ 18), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 51% (W/L 20/ 19). Hennemann has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 64% (W/L 14/ 8), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 26/ 17).
- Player level: In the last year, Zaar has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 72.22% of matches (W/L 13/ 5), where as Hennemann has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 56.1% of matches (W/L 23/ 18). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Zaar winning 1 times and Hennemann being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Zaar winning 2 and Hennemann winning 0. The last match between Zaar and Hennemann was at the W25 Danderyd, 10-08-2022, First, Clay with Lisa Zaar getting the victory 6-3 7-5.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:40:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Zaar and Hennemann have played a deciding set 0 times, with Zaar winning 0 times and Hennemann 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Zaar winning 0, and Hennemann 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Zaar has played against opponents with an average rank of 163.48 while Hennemann has played against players with an average rank of 269.93.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Zaar has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hennemann has won 47% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Zaar has converted 50.49% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hennemann has converted 53.61% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
714
Rank
498
High
24
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
394
Rank
283
High
23
Age
Plays
L
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
Form
W
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
56% (53-42)
Career Total W/L
63% (164-98)
63% (5-3)
YTD W/L
77% (30-9)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
2
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Lisa Zaar vs Caijsa Wilda Hennemann For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Zaar VS Hennemann
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Lisa Zaar | Caijsa Wilda Hennemann |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 8 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:40:0 | 1:40:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 74% (40/54) | 63% (39/62) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 63% (25/40) | 46% (18/39) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 50% (7/14) | 39% (9/23) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 54% (7/13) | 67% (4/6) |
| Return Points W% | 56% (35/62) | 41% (22/54) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 7-5 |
Stats 
Lisa Zaar
Player
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
2
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
41%
(
22 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Lisa Zaar | Caijsa Wilda Hennemann |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 63% (5/3) | 77% (30/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 60% (12/8) | 76% (64/20) |
| Games Win/Loss | 58% (106/78) | 60% (463/312) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 63% (5/3) | 89% (8/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 78% (18/5) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 57% (4/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.01 | 0.1 |
| Aces Total | 1 | 38 |
| DFs per game | 0.4 | 0.18 |
| DFs Total | 36 | 68 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:14:45 | 1:41:21 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 278 |
| 1st Serve % | 71% (447/630) | 70% (1606/2309) |
| 1st Serve W% | 57% (256/447) | 62% (994/1606) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (84/183) | 46% (325/703) |
| BPs Won% Total | 50% (52/103) | 54% (193/360) |
| Return Pts W% | 52% (336/642) | 52% (1165/2224) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) | 63% (10/6) |
| Futures W/L | 71% (5/2) | 90% (18/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 63% (5/8) | 77% (30/39) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (1/3) | 67% (4/6) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (2/4) | 33% (2/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 67% (6/4) | 91% (33/30) |
| 1st set W, L | 33% (6/2) | 9% (33/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 50% (2/1) | 0% (6/0) |
Lisa Zaar Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Julieta Pareja
Player
Lisa Zaar
75%
(
84 of
112)
1st Serve %
78%
(
78 of
100)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
4
56%
(
47 of
84)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
41 of
78)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
48%
(
54 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
51 of
100)
109
Total Points Won
103
|
4-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lisa Zaar
Player
Klara Kosan
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
2
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
40%
(
18 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Gabriella Broadfoot
Player
Lisa Zaar
48%
(
31 of
64)
1st Serve %
71%
(
55 of
78)
2
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
3
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
39 of
78)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Lisa Zaar
Player
Chloe Noel
68%
(
90 of
132)
1st Serve %
63%
(
88 of
140)
0
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
6
57%
(
51 of
90)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
51 of
88)
55%
(
23 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
21 of
52)
40%
(
8 of
20)
Break Points Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
44%
(
58 of
132)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
68 of
140)
142
Total Points Won
130
|
6-7(5) 7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lisa Zaar
Player
Lily Fairclough
81%
(
55 of
68)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
43%
(
29 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
37 of
67)
76
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lisa Zaar
Player
Julieta Pareja
65%
(
50 of
77)
1st Serve %
71%
(
54 of
76)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
3
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
24 of
54)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
47%
(
9 of
19)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
47%
(
36 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
47 of
76)
88
Total Points Won
65
|
6-1 4-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lisa Zaar
Player
Giorgia Roselli
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve %
57%
(
25 of
44)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
2
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
11 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
59
Total Points Won
24
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Liv Hovde
Player
Lisa Zaar
56%
(
45 of
80)
1st Serve %
71%
(
65 of
91)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
7
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
46%
(
37 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
48 of
91)
91
Total Points Won
80
|
3-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Asylzhan Arystanbekova
Player
Lisa Zaar
54%
(
21 of
39)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
71%
(
15 of
21)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
44%
(
17 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
48
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 2-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Valerija Maija Kargina
Player
Lisa Zaar
60%
(
63 of
105)
1st Serve %
69%
(
68 of
98)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
8
57%
(
36 of
63)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
39 of
68)
40%
(
17 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
50%
(
52 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
47 of
98)
100
Total Points Won
103
|
2-6 7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
Player
Ana Giraldi Requena
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
10
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
19 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nina Stojanovic
Player
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
60%
(
49 of
82)
1st Serve %
66%
(
67 of
101)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
43%
(
35 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
50 of
101)
97
Total Points Won
86
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
Player
Natalija Senic
76%
(
45 of
59)
1st Serve %
61%
(
30 of
49)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
Player
Mana Kawamura
71%
(
47 of
66)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
51%
(
24 of
47)
1st Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
80%
(
8 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
48%
(
32 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Irina Fetecau
Player
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
71%
(
52 of
73)
1st Serve %
67%
(
64 of
96)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
54%
(
28 of
52)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
32 of
64)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
49%
(
36 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
53 of
96)
90
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
Player
Elena Malygina
79%
(
58 of
73)
1st Serve %
71%
(
54 of
76)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
3
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
34%
(
25 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
76)
85
Total Points Won
64
|
6-1 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
Player
Vlada Katic
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve %
64%
(
23 of
36)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
2
64%
(
16 of
25)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
88%
(
15 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
54
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
Player
Elena Malygina
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve %
79%
(
31 of
39)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
0
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
14 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
56
Total Points Won
26
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
Player
Sina Herrmann
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve %
66%
(
29 of
44)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
24%
(
9 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
56
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
Player
Marcelina Podlinska
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve %
85%
(
61 of
72)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
33%
(
5 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
47%
(
27 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
41 of
72)
71
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Zaar Vs Hennemann Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Zaar are available here and Hennemann photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
